Page 1 of 1

Oh, the latest numbers of dead in Iraq are BS BTW

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:00 am
by Dardedar
DAR
I strongly suspected this was the case, then I read this. And remember, this is just the ones that make it to the morgue:

***
Toll in Iraq's Deadly Surge: 1,300
By Ellen Knickmeyer and Bassam Sebti
The Washington Post

Tuesday 28 February 2006

Morgue count eclipses other tallies since shrine attack.

Baghdad - Grisly attacks and other sectarian violence unleashed by last week's bombing of a Shiite Muslim shrine have killed more than 1,300 Iraqis, making the past few days the deadliest of the war outside of major U.S. offensives, according to Baghdad's main morgue. The toll was more than three times higher than the figure previously reported by the U.S. military and the news media.

Hundreds of unclaimed dead lay at the morgue at midday Monday - blood-caked men who had been shot, knifed, garroted or apparently suffocated by the plastic bags still over their heads. Many of the bodies were sprawled with their hands still bound - and many of them had wound up at the morgue after what their families said was their abduction by the Mahdi Army, the Shiite militia of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr.

"After he came back from the evening prayer, the Mahdi Army broke into his house and asked him, 'Are you Khalid the Sunni infidel?' " one man at the morgue said, relating what were the last hours of his cousin, according to other relatives. "He replied yes and then they took him away."

...

The rest here:

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/022806J.shtml

D.

Image

[/url]

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:53 am
by Barbara Fitzpatrick
It doesn't help to say, "I told you so" when the predicted results are the lives of so many people - but every expert on the Middle East said the result of our attacks on Iraq would be civil war (both before and after we actually did it). The Bush administration has shown the most callous disregard for the long-term safety of our, and everybody else's, nation of any administration in the history of America. And the RWs just keep cheering him on!

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:23 pm
by Dardedar
Barbara Fitzpatrick wrote: ...every expert on the Middle East said the result of our attacks on Iraq would be civil war (both before and after we actually did it).
DAR
FOX is now reporting that the idea of a civil war in Iraq is really just a media stunt. Here is the screen shot:

Image

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/fox ... civil-war/

Also ironic is that only last week they were exploring the idea that a civil war could be a good thing. Observe:

Image

And:

Image

http://mediamatters.org/items/200602240003


D.

Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:06 am
by Savonarola
Wow... FAUX News's propensity for surpassing the absurd is legendary.

Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:07 pm
by Barbara Fitzpatrick
Unfortunately, Faux News watchers propensity for BELIEVING the absurd is even more legendary.

Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:35 pm
by Savonarola
Barbara Fitzpatrick wrote:Unfortunately, Faux News watchers propensity for BELIEVING the absurd is even more legendary.
Touché, Barbara...