Roasting The Jarhead: "Here's What I think"
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:26 am
DAR
Bob Hall, The Old Jarhead has written a new essay entitled: Here's What I think. It's a long rightwing rant with about 80 little paragraphs and over 3,800 words. I've been itching to give it a good spanking. I would like to respond in his comment section but, for a man who likes to bray about freedom, he regularly finds it necessary to censor comments he doesn't agree with. But all the butt kissers do get through! I will try to be as polite as I can with this nonsense.
Let's begin:
****
Here's what I think--an essay
Excerpts:
You give no reference and are smart to say "attributed to him," since your quotes are probably bogus. I'll just look at the first one. Jefferson didn't say "every citizen should be a soldier." He was speaking against "standing armies." Here is what Jefferson said, in context:
"The Greeks and Romans had no standing armies, yet they defended themselves. The Greeks by their laws, and the Romans by the spirit of their people, took care to put into the hands of their rulers no such engine of oppression as a standing army. Their system was to make every man a soldier and oblige him to repair to the standard of his country whenever that was reared. This made them invincible; and the same remedy will make us so."
--Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 1814. ME 14:184
If we didn't have a "standing army," we wouldn't really have a military would we? Is that what you are for?
Obviously, the science of climate change isn't based upon the size of Al Gore's carbon footprint, which is zero.
In your "I'm Tired" rant ( dismantled here) you claimed, with no basis whatsoever, to only have 5% of the carbon footprint of Al Gore. It was pointed out to you that no, his carbon foot print is zero, because he buys carbon offsets. Now you again erroneously claim his carbon footprint is greater than yours but this isn't good enough. He should do more. You apparently aren't aware that he donated the profit from his books and movie, to charity:
"Tipper and I are devoting 100 percent of the profits from the book and the movie to a new bipartisan educational campaign to further spread the message about global warming." Link
Know how to consistently know a conservative is lying? When you see them saying something about Al Gore, you can be confident they are lying.
This "bulletin" you speak of "was just one of several assessing various terrorism threats to our national security;..." And because "these bulletins were intended for local law-enforcement officials, they necessarily focused on domestic threats." Also, it's worth noting "that the bulletin was ordered by the Bush administration, well before Obama took office, and was conducted by Bush-hired intelligence specialists."
And note: "...the report only singles out returning veterans who become active in violent hate groups."
Source: http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert ... g-veterans
If he had apologized, (he didn't of course) it would have been for GW Bush, and the apology would have been well deserved. The French were right to not invade a country over bogus charges, Bush was wrong. Here is what Obama actually said:
That didn't take much doing! They were small, irrelevant and filled to the brim with right-wing extremists. One of the clips I watched had the crowd chanting "Heads on stakes! Heads on stakes!" Is that extreme? Is that behavior to be proud of?
I think it is a good thing when the president of our country can work "amiably" with the elected leaders of other countries. I'm just funny that way I guess. Republicans could learn from that method. Hopefully it'll be a while before they have a chance.
So it's a conspiracy and the courts will join in on it if necessary. At least you're not a nut Bob!
Maybe she shouldn't have waited 21 years to "sell" her story to the Wall Street Journal?
Feminists are quiet about these things? Really? Do you know what a feminist is Bob?
Who denigrates veterans Bob? Be specific. Bill O'Reilly said there are few if any homeless vets. There are about 200,000. Does that count? The Disabled Veteran group "DAV" rates politicians on how they vote in support of veterans issues in these categories:
* Budget
* Appropriations
* Amendments to increase funding
* Emergency supplemental funding for VA
They score each member 1 to 100.
McCain's score is 20.
What score does this non-partisan group give Barack Obama?
Barack's score is: 80
But you're a McCain supporter, facts be damned.
Source: http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_d ... ?r_id=3483
Yes Bush, he was big on advancing "regulation." What a load. Here's the debunk of this one:
"In 1999, former Senator Phil Gramm (who is, incidentally, Senator John McCain's economic adviser and cochairs his presidential campaign) set out to completely gut the Glass-Steagall Act, and did so successfully, replacing most of its components with the new Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act: allowing commercial banks, investment banks, and insurers to merge (which would have violated antitrust laws under Glass-Steagall). Sen. Gramm was the driving force behind the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, as he had received over $4.6 million from the FIRE sector (Finance, Insurance and Real Estate donations) over the previous decade, and once the Act passed, an influx of "megamergers" took place among banks and insurance and securities companies, as if they had been eagerly awaiting the passage of Gramm's Act. Everything in between Glass-Steagall and Gramm-Leach-Bliley (i.e. Savings and Loan crisis/bust) was, in large part, the incubation period for what would take place over the nine years that would follow the passage of Gramm's Act: an experiment in deregulation.
Shortly after George W. Bush was elected president, Congress and President Clinton were trying to pass a $384 billion omnibus spending bill, and while the debates swirled around the passage of this bill, Senator Phil Gramm clandestinely slipped a 262-page amendment into the omnibus appropriations bill titled: Commodity Futures Modernization Act. It is likely that few senators read this bill, if any. The essence of the act was the deregulation of derivatives trading (financial instruments whose value changes in response to the changes in underlying variables; the main use of derivatives is to reduce risk for one party). The legislation contained a provision -- lobbied for by Enron, a major campaign contributor to Gramm -- that exempted energy trading from regulatory oversight. Basically, it gave way to the Enron debacle and ushered in the new era of unregulated securities. Interestingly enough, Gramm's wife, Wendy, had been part of the Enron board, and her salary and stock income brought in between $900,000 and $1.8 million to the Gramm household, prior to the passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act."
LINK
Trouble is, there is also a zero exoneration rate for those who aren't guilty. Here is a list of the 131 people who have been exonerated since 1973. The most recent one was 10 days ago. Good thing we didn't kill him eh Bob?
The List
Hey Bob, what's the recidivism rate for people we lock up in maximum security and never let out? Zero. And it's cheaper. And when we find out they didn't do it, we can let them go and not be guilty of having had our government murder them on our behalf. I think that's better.
I am glad you are on the right side of this issue Bob. Hopefully you party will get a clue. It will all be moot very soon. The kids don't care. Their parents bigotry didn't stick. They make fun of the bigots, every night on The Daily Show. 10-20 years from now, anti-gay bigots will be viewed as people who think blacks should drink from a different water fountain. Why is it the conservatives are ALWAYS on the wrong side of these civil rights issues Bob?
You leave out context and distort. I hadn't investigated this one before so I went and watched the video clip of Obama saying this. He clearly, obviously, misspoke and meant to say 47 states. This makes him "dumb?" He misstated one digit of a number? This is your BEST example?! Oh, it's your ONLY example. Got it. And you can make this charge after GW Bush?
Regarding Dan Quayle, he didn't just spell a simple word wrong (as we have all done), he went up to a grade school child at a spelling bee who had spelled the word potato correctly on the black board and he CORRECTED him telling the child he was wrong and needed to add an "e." That's a little different.
Well that was fun. Roast complete. Maybe you ought to send me these to fact check before you post them eh Bob? That's what "I think."
Darrel.
---
Update. Bob censored this post so I tried to post a link. We'll see if he's too afraid to allow that.
Update: He is too afraid to post a link.
Bob Hall, The Old Jarhead has written a new essay entitled: Here's What I think. It's a long rightwing rant with about 80 little paragraphs and over 3,800 words. I've been itching to give it a good spanking. I would like to respond in his comment section but, for a man who likes to bray about freedom, he regularly finds it necessary to censor comments he doesn't agree with. But all the butt kissers do get through! I will try to be as polite as I can with this nonsense.
Let's begin:
****
Here's what I think--an essay
Excerpts:
DARBOB
"I think reading quotations from great thinkers is part of an ongoing education. And I think the quotes of Thomas Jefferson are among the best. When I read these quotes attributed to him:
--Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be the that of everry[sic] free state."
You give no reference and are smart to say "attributed to him," since your quotes are probably bogus. I'll just look at the first one. Jefferson didn't say "every citizen should be a soldier." He was speaking against "standing armies." Here is what Jefferson said, in context:
"The Greeks and Romans had no standing armies, yet they defended themselves. The Greeks by their laws, and the Romans by the spirit of their people, took care to put into the hands of their rulers no such engine of oppression as a standing army. Their system was to make every man a soldier and oblige him to repair to the standard of his country whenever that was reared. This made them invincible; and the same remedy will make us so."
--Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 1814. ME 14:184
If we didn't have a "standing army," we wouldn't really have a military would we? Is that what you are for?
DARBOB
"I think if Global Warming was really a crisis, then Al Gore would lower his carbon footprint to, say, only five times mine—and still use his wealth from his books and videos to buy carbon offsets."
Obviously, the science of climate change isn't based upon the size of Al Gore's carbon footprint, which is zero.
In your "I'm Tired" rant ( dismantled here) you claimed, with no basis whatsoever, to only have 5% of the carbon footprint of Al Gore. It was pointed out to you that no, his carbon foot print is zero, because he buys carbon offsets. Now you again erroneously claim his carbon footprint is greater than yours but this isn't good enough. He should do more. You apparently aren't aware that he donated the profit from his books and movie, to charity:
"Tipper and I are devoting 100 percent of the profits from the book and the movie to a new bipartisan educational campaign to further spread the message about global warming." Link
Know how to consistently know a conservative is lying? When you see them saying something about Al Gore, you can be confident they are lying.
You mean right-wing terrorists? Would you like a list of them? Here is a list of 900 hate groups. Notice that they are almost all rightwing hate groups and overwhelmingly Christian.BOB
"I think if profiling terrorists was really wrong, the Department of Homeland Security wouldn’t be profiling veterans who served the country as potential terrorists, instead of members of groups who have attacked America repeatedly over the past 30 years."
This "bulletin" you speak of "was just one of several assessing various terrorism threats to our national security;..." And because "these bulletins were intended for local law-enforcement officials, they necessarily focused on domestic threats." Also, it's worth noting "that the bulletin was ordered by the Bush administration, well before Obama took office, and was conducted by Bush-hired intelligence specialists."
And note: "...the report only singles out returning veterans who become active in violent hate groups."
Source: http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert ... g-veterans
DARBOB
"I think while the President was apologizing to the French for America, he should have apologized to them for the mess we made landing in Normandy..."
If he had apologized, (he didn't of course) it would have been for GW Bush, and the apology would have been well deserved. The French were right to not invade a country over bogus charges, Bush was wrong. Here is what Obama actually said:
"We must be honest with ourselves," the president said. "In recent years, we've allowed our alliance to drift."
Obama said the United States was partly to blame because "there have been times where America's shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive" toward Europe. But he said Europe had to accept responsibility and make changes too.
"In Europe, there is an anti-Americanism that is at once casual but can also be insidious. Instead of recognizing the good that America so often does in the world, there have been times where Europeans chose to blame America for much of what's bad," Obama said.
Both of these attitudes "do not represent the truth," Obama continued. "America is changing, but it cannot be America alone that changes." --ABC
DARBOB
"I think the media was desperate to make out the Tax Protest Tea Parties as small, irrelevant and composed only of right-wing extremists.
That didn't take much doing! They were small, irrelevant and filled to the brim with right-wing extremists. One of the clips I watched had the crowd chanting "Heads on stakes! Heads on stakes!" Is that extreme? Is that behavior to be proud of?
DARBOB
"I think there’s a philosophical reason... the President sees Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez as fellow leaders he can work amiability[sic] with."
I think it is a good thing when the president of our country can work "amiably" with the elected leaders of other countries. I'm just funny that way I guess. Republicans could learn from that method. Hopefully it'll be a while before they have a chance.
DARBOB
"I think the people trying to prove the President was not born in the US are wasting their time. You could prove beyond doubt he was born on Mars and it wouldn’t matter. The courts would find a way to rule he qualified as a citizen..."
So it's a conspiracy and the courts will join in on it if necessary. At least you're not a nut Bob!
DARBOB
"I think feminists who said that women don’t lie about rape were awfully quiet when a woman accused Bill Clinton of raping her."
Maybe she shouldn't have waited 21 years to "sell" her story to the Wall Street Journal?
DARBOB
"And they are still pretty quiet about genital mutilation, honor killings, forced marriage of girl children, the burning of girls’ schools and the second class status of women under Shari’a law..."
Feminists are quiet about these things? Really? Do you know what a feminist is Bob?
DARBOB
"I think those who denigrate veterans do so because inside, they know they weren’t good enough to serve."
Who denigrates veterans Bob? Be specific. Bill O'Reilly said there are few if any homeless vets. There are about 200,000. Does that count? The Disabled Veteran group "DAV" rates politicians on how they vote in support of veterans issues in these categories:
* Budget
* Appropriations
* Amendments to increase funding
* Emergency supplemental funding for VA
They score each member 1 to 100.
McCain's score is 20.
What score does this non-partisan group give Barack Obama?
Barack's score is: 80
But you're a McCain supporter, facts be damned.
Source: http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_d ... ?r_id=3483
DARBOB
"I think both parties and all countries are trying to make political hay blaming the economic crisis on others. As a Republican, I tend to point to the Community Reinvestment Act, Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac—and the documented efforts of Bush, McCain and others to regulate them better."
Yes Bush, he was big on advancing "regulation." What a load. Here's the debunk of this one:
"In 1999, former Senator Phil Gramm (who is, incidentally, Senator John McCain's economic adviser and cochairs his presidential campaign) set out to completely gut the Glass-Steagall Act, and did so successfully, replacing most of its components with the new Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act: allowing commercial banks, investment banks, and insurers to merge (which would have violated antitrust laws under Glass-Steagall). Sen. Gramm was the driving force behind the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, as he had received over $4.6 million from the FIRE sector (Finance, Insurance and Real Estate donations) over the previous decade, and once the Act passed, an influx of "megamergers" took place among banks and insurance and securities companies, as if they had been eagerly awaiting the passage of Gramm's Act. Everything in between Glass-Steagall and Gramm-Leach-Bliley (i.e. Savings and Loan crisis/bust) was, in large part, the incubation period for what would take place over the nine years that would follow the passage of Gramm's Act: an experiment in deregulation.
Shortly after George W. Bush was elected president, Congress and President Clinton were trying to pass a $384 billion omnibus spending bill, and while the debates swirled around the passage of this bill, Senator Phil Gramm clandestinely slipped a 262-page amendment into the omnibus appropriations bill titled: Commodity Futures Modernization Act. It is likely that few senators read this bill, if any. The essence of the act was the deregulation of derivatives trading (financial instruments whose value changes in response to the changes in underlying variables; the main use of derivatives is to reduce risk for one party). The legislation contained a provision -- lobbied for by Enron, a major campaign contributor to Gramm -- that exempted energy trading from regulatory oversight. Basically, it gave way to the Enron debacle and ushered in the new era of unregulated securities. Interestingly enough, Gramm's wife, Wendy, had been part of the Enron board, and her salary and stock income brought in between $900,000 and $1.8 million to the Gramm household, prior to the passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act."
LINK
DARBOB
"I think there is a zero recidivism rate among people who have been executed."
Trouble is, there is also a zero exoneration rate for those who aren't guilty. Here is a list of the 131 people who have been exonerated since 1973. The most recent one was 10 days ago. Good thing we didn't kill him eh Bob?
The List
Hey Bob, what's the recidivism rate for people we lock up in maximum security and never let out? Zero. And it's cheaper. And when we find out they didn't do it, we can let them go and not be guilty of having had our government murder them on our behalf. I think that's better.
DARBOB
"I think folks who worry that gays getting married will hurt the institution of marriage must have pretty weak marriages themselves."
I am glad you are on the right side of this issue Bob. Hopefully you party will get a clue. It will all be moot very soon. The kids don't care. Their parents bigotry didn't stick. They make fun of the bigots, every night on The Daily Show. 10-20 years from now, anti-gay bigots will be viewed as people who think blacks should drink from a different water fountain. Why is it the conservatives are ALWAYS on the wrong side of these civil rights issues Bob?
DARBOB
"I think if Dan Quayle misspelling “potato” when reading from a card the school gave him proves he’s dumb, then Barack Obama saying he’d campaigned in 57 states, with one to go, proves the same thing about him..."
You leave out context and distort. I hadn't investigated this one before so I went and watched the video clip of Obama saying this. He clearly, obviously, misspoke and meant to say 47 states. This makes him "dumb?" He misstated one digit of a number? This is your BEST example?! Oh, it's your ONLY example. Got it. And you can make this charge after GW Bush?
Regarding Dan Quayle, he didn't just spell a simple word wrong (as we have all done), he went up to a grade school child at a spelling bee who had spelled the word potato correctly on the black board and he CORRECTED him telling the child he was wrong and needed to add an "e." That's a little different.
Well that was fun. Roast complete. Maybe you ought to send me these to fact check before you post them eh Bob? That's what "I think."
Darrel.
---
Update. Bob censored this post so I tried to post a link. We'll see if he's too afraid to allow that.
Update: He is too afraid to post a link.