Page 1 of 1

McCain: Superstitious Nut

Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 9:22 am
by Dardedar
DAR
Is this a joke? Apparently not.

***
su·per·sti·tion n.

1. An irrational belief that an object, action, or circumstance not logically related to a course of events influences its outcome.
2.
1. A belief, practice, or rite irrationally maintained by ignorance of the laws of nature or by faith in magic or chance.
2. A fearful or abject state of mind resulting from such ignorance or irrationality.

American Heritage Dictionary
***

McCain channeling all his luck toward 2008 race

Image

By Joseph Curl
April 16, 2008

United Press International Sen. John McCain, the likely Republican nominee, carries a lucky penny, nickel and quarter, among other trinkets. He might have accrued a lucky dime on the campaign trail in January, were it not heads down.

Don't try to pass a salt shaker to John McCain. He won't take it from your hand because it's bad luck.

The Arizona senator also won't throw a hat on a bed — it means death will soon visit the household — but he regularly carries 31 cents in lucky change in his pocket.

Now the presumptive Republican presidential nominee has converted his staff to his famously superstitious ways. Whenever anyone says something optimistic — especially about this fall's general election — a slew of staffers join him in knocking on wood.

"That's an ugly habit I've picked up myself," Brooke Buchanan, the senator's national press secretary, said with a laugh. "We were in Kansas City ... and someone mentioned winning in November, and three of us knocked on wood. We don't want to jinx anything. We're all very superstitious people."

Top adviser Mark Salter also has been influenced.

"I grew a beard in 2000 and didn't shave until the campaign was over, and I did it this time, too. That's my little superstition. I probably won't shave it until November," he said, adding that he's not sure if Mr. McCain "considers it lucky, or if he considers it an eyesore."

Mr. McCain has dozens of superstitions and rituals, many stemming from his days as a Navy fighter pilot, a notoriously superstitious bunch. He carries a lucky feather, a lucky compass and a lucky penny — not to mention a lucky nickel and a lucky quarter.

"He had so many of them that we had to cut down. It was like a change purse in his pocket," Miss Buchanan said, laughing.

Joseph W. McQuaid, publisher of the Union Leader newspaper of Manchester, N.H., gave Mr. McCain a lucky penny he'd found (heads up, of course) just before Mr. McCain won the New Hampshire primary, on Jan. 8.

Mr. McCain also pocketed a nickel he found outside his hotel in Columbia, S.C., just before that state's primary — his second primary win.

As for the quarter, "I think he just found that on the ground," Miss Buchanan said. "It's always what he finds, heads up."

Still, it's what she called "a lucky drummer boy quarter" — a 1976 bicentennial commemorative quarter.

He doesn't have a dime — a lucky one, that is — but he almost picked up one in January. When he went to the Republican debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, Mr. McCain noticed a shiny dime on the stage floor. He stooped for a closer look, but it was tails up — rejected.

"The Irish have a thing about heads and tails," said Catherine Yronwode, co-founder of the Lucky Mojo Curio Co. and an authority on talismans. "People of Irish descent think that if a coin is heads up, it's lucky; if it's tails up, leave it, let the poor have it."

Irish, indeed. On St. Patrick's Day in Chicago, "this guy had a lucky four-leaf clover that was laminated," Miss Buchanan said. "He pulled it out of his pocket and told the senator it had brought him good luck, and now the senator carries it around in his wallet."

"Am I superstitious? I'm that," Mr. McCain said. "But I don't think I'm alone there."

Washington Times

Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 12:07 am
by LaWood
McCain has a come-to-truth moment:

"My friends, I will have an energy policy which will eliminate our dependence on oil from Middle East that will then prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East." --McCain, May 2, 08


Chris Matthews opines:
"You know, if somebody else were to say that, they would be accused of being a communist, or radical, or a leftist.for John McCain, a war hero, to say that we're fighting in the Middle East to protect our oil sources is an astounding development." --ibid

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/0 ... -over-oil/

Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 7:58 am
by Dardedar
DAR
Here is the update on that Larry:

UPDATE
McCain has a gotten a little flack over this but not nearly enough. His response? To blatantly lie about it! He now says he was referring to the first Gulf War:
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) clarified his comments Friday after suggesting the Iraq war was motivated by U.S. reliance on foreign oil.

His explanation: He was talking about the 1991 Persian Gulf War, not the current conflict.

He sought to clarify his comments after his campaign plane landed in Phoenix. He said he didn’t mean the U.S. went to war in Iraq five years ago over oil.

“No, no, I was talking about that we had fought the Gulf War for several reasons,” McCain told reporters.

One reason was Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait, he said.

“But also we didn’t want him to have control over the oil, and that part of the world is critical to us because of our dependency on foreign oil, and it’s more important than any other part of the world,” he said.

“I want us to remove our dependency on foreign oil for national security reasons, and that’s all I mean,” McCain said.

Regarding the current conflict, he said, “The Congressional Record is very clear: I said we went to war in Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction.”
DAR
Here is the transcript of what he said. Does it sound like he’s talking about the first Gulf War?

"Senator Obama and Senator Clinton want to set a date for withdraw. That’s what they want to do is get everybody out. I believe that would lead to catastrophe and chaos and that we would have the whole region including the whole region and the country in such turmoil that we would be required to come back to the region. And I just want to promise you this. My friends, I will have an energy policy that we will be talking about, which will eliminate our dependence on oil from the Middle East that will - that will then prevent us - that will prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East."

LINK

What a liar!

D.

Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 2:25 pm
by LaWood
What a liar!
Take your choice: McBush or McThird.

Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 12:25 pm
by Barbara Fitzpatrick
We've got to figure a way to refer to this that won't get the R-leaning Indies' backs up. This guy isn't Bush II, he's Ronald Reagan with all the powers W has accrued over the last 7 years. Think really, really, really dangerous for our democratic republic - but almost as "loveable" as "the Gipper" (as long as the MSM keeps doing the propaganda). We need all the Dems plus any Indies and even sane Rs to get both the White House and a Dem enough Congress to (try to) fix this mess. We won't get them by insulting "the Maverick" - only by showing them he isn't one, politely.