The Moonie, Post Jiggy Holy Handkerchief is not to be washed

Post Reply
User avatar
Dardedar
Site Admin
Posts: 8193
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:18 pm
Designate the number of cents in half a dollar: 0
Location: Fayetteville
Contact:

The Moonie, Post Jiggy Holy Handkerchief is not to be washed

Post by Dardedar »

Rev. Moon's Conjugal Visitations
By John Gorenfeld
AlterNet.org

Monday 17 April 2006

We all know the religious Right wants to tell us what we can't do in the bedroom, but no one asks what they want us to do instead.

Among the trendier gripes about why liberals lack power in American politics is that there isn't enough tolerance for America's faithful. A big problem, Rabbi Michael Lerner recently sighed, is that "the Left's hostility to religion and spirituality has become such a major stumbling block to the chances that progressive forces will ever win enough power" to make a difference. So the new advice, from Hillary Clinton to the New Republic's Gregg Easterbrook, is: Stop making snickering remarks at Jerry Falwell's expense. Cheer the innovation of $2 billion in federal tax money carted off to religious groups last year. Drag the "Left Behind" series into your Amazon shopping cart.

And listen, I should add, to the Reverend Sun Myung Moon, owner of the conservative mouthpiece the Washington Times and self-proclaimed Messiah. Moon's warning to America is that we must have sex the way he entreats us, in the positions he has designated, or else forfeit our "love organs," as he dubs them, to the dark lord Satan.

We all know the Right wants to decide what we can't do in the bedroom. But no one ever seems to ask what the Right wants us to do instead.

"After the act of love," read the instructions from the Rev. Moon's conservative Family Federation, "both spouses should wipe their sexual areas with the Holy Handkerchief. Hang the handkerchief to dry naturally and keep them eternally. They must be kept individually labeled and should never be laundered and mixed up."

Maybe the best explanation of our widespread ignorance of the Washington Times owner's sex rites is liberal squeamishness. For those of you who suckled on secular humanism and feminist tracts (which Moon calls Satanic, by the way), these prescriptions from God might seem as off-putting as a Castro Street postcard storefront to Dr. James Dobson.

But in order to usher in a national dialogue on faith in the public square, it's important to look beyond stereotypes of the Right to understand the diverse philosophies behind public movements for state-enforced morality.

Rev. Moon, whose Washington Times is a crown jewel of the conservative media Death Star, offers the essential lessons. He's the last man most Americans would associate with Republican power circles, but is in his own secretive way as important a figure in the Christian Right as Jerry Falwell, who's still in business thanks to a $3.5 million bailout from Moon in 1995, or Tim LaHaye of the Council For National Policy, who took money to serve on the board of a group rehabilitating Moon's image, and once wrote a letter addressing Moon as "the Master."

Just how big is Moon's standing in the Right? The "Republican Noise Machine" is a mighty edifice built with $3 billion in gifts from various right-wing philanthropists. Moon's gift of the Washington Times to the conservative cause alone places him in the club as a charter member; the paper owes its existence to a staggering figure of over $2,000,000,000 since 1982 in donations in Moon's mystery money.

Moon also also controls United Press International, one of the world's largest wire news services. In addition to having a hand in the creation of modern-day Christian Right politics, Moon has given huge sums to Richard Viguerie, the "founding funder" of the Reagan revolution; Terry Dolan, the pioneer of the "liberal bias" attack; and George W. Bush, who received $250,000 from Moon in 2004.

By 1989, US News & World Report was reporting Moon had built "a network of affiliated organizations and connections in almost every conservative organization in Washington, including the Heritage Foundation," but that "conservatives ... fear repercussions if they expose the church's role." In 2004, a veteran Christian Right lobbyist, Gary Jarmin, arranged to have Moon coronated the "King of Peace" in a kitschy ceremony on Capitol Hill in which he wore a glittering crown and royal robes.

Moon, the first President Bush said, while touring South America with the True Father in 1996, is "the man with the vision" whose newspaper "restores sanity to Washington." So why must the gatekeepers of the mainstream media bar his ideas from the public debate on morality? Why does his own employee, Times editorial page editor Tony Blankley, whose paper Moon says he mainly established to "tell the world about God," hold back from telling the McLaughlin Group about the greatness of Rev. Moon's plans for society?

In the interest of healthy public discourse, it bears upon us instead to consider the philosophy fueling Moon, who has long acted on his professed longing to see gays and "free sex" banished from America. Moon's Federation offers an instruction manual explaining, among other things, on which occasions the man should be on top, how Satan can be banished with the spank of a wooden paddle and franker lessons still.
...snip...

http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/041906WC.shtml
.
.
Moonie Wedding:
.
Image
Barbara Fitzpatrick
Posts: 2232
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:55 am
Designate the number of cents in half a dollar: 0

Post by Barbara Fitzpatrick »

Yes, Moon is even more insidious than Murdoch - and M&M will be at odds, should they actually manage to bring the Constitution down, but while they are working on it, they work overtly and covertly hand in hand. There's a philosophy out there that says Christ isn't an individual, but a social organism. If so, then the anti-christ is also a social organism and this is it.
Barbara Fitzpatrick
User avatar
Dardedar
Site Admin
Posts: 8193
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:18 pm
Designate the number of cents in half a dollar: 0
Location: Fayetteville
Contact:

Post by Dardedar »

Latest fundie stats. We have more of them than ever:
.
Image
.
***

Two polls, reported a week apart.

The first, from March 27, reports "a significant increase in the born-again population...the highest ever measured in the quarter century that Barna has been tracking that measure."

According to the survey of just over 1000 "randomly selected adults in the continental United States" 45 percent could be classified born again Christians, using the Group's criteria for classification: "'Born again Christians are defined as people who said they have made a personal commitment to Jesus Christ that is still important in their life today and who also indicated they believe that when they die they will go to Heaven because they had confessed their sins and had accepted Jesus Christ as their savior. Respondents were not asked to describe themselves as 'born again.'"

The Group is enthused that this number -- almost half of American adults -- is substantially up from the 31 percent figure in 1983 and appreciably better than the 41 percent recorded in 1991. A robust 16 percent upsurge of born again baby boomers (BABBs) was recorded "with 53% now meeting the born again criteria," Barna makes a distinction between "Evangelical born again" -- those whose core religious behaviors mirror their commitment to Jesus, and non-Evangelical born-agains (36 percent) who are more prone to backsliding or ennui and do not exhibit all of the core religious behaviors.

Good news too, notional Christians—people who call themselves Christian but who are not born again, have declined from 46 percent in 1991 to 36 percent today. They are clearly the beleaguered minority. Non-believers and "people aligned with other faith traditions" are lumped together at 10 percent of the population. They are hardly worth mentioning.

More Barna Gains

The second poll, of April 3, was also cause for celebration by the Evangelicals.

The survey assessed the "core religious behaviors" of the not-quite 50 percent of Born Agains and found prolific increases in weekly Bible reading (31 percent in 1995, 47 percent today); church attendance (37 percent in 1996, 49 percent today); and smaller but appreciable increases in volunteerism (27 percent), Bible-study group participation (23 percent). Adult Sunday school attendance (23 percent).

Only in two "core" areas was there no significant change. Only 84 percent (4 out of 5) of those surveyed said they prayed every day; and only six out of ten of those classified as Born Agains "claimed to have shared their beliefs about Jesus with someone whom they knew believed differently"("evangelization"). The two disappointing results were tagged as "stable behaviors."
***

LINK
.
.
Image
.
.
Barbara Fitzpatrick
Posts: 2232
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:55 am
Designate the number of cents in half a dollar: 0

Post by Barbara Fitzpatrick »

What this survey/poll/whatever doesn't do is give the split between the end-timers who call themselves born-again christians and the evangelicals (their name for themselves), who, while "born-again", do not support W and his armegeddon-creating nutcases. Evangelicals are not necessarily fundies - while they believe you have to be "saved" by "accepting Jesus Christ as your own personal savior", and that part of their "mission" is to convince other people of that, do not necessarily believe in the inerrant word of the bible. Nor do they necessarily believe that their mission is to coerce (rather than convince) others of their religious beliefs, much less legislate them. The evangelicals are the groups now protesting Iraq and supporting changes to deal with global warming - what the MSM keeps saying shows loss in W's "base" - the MSM is wrong. This group "went along" with W, but were not core supporters. Now that he's proving us Dems to be right about him, they are speaking up.
Barbara Fitzpatrick
Post Reply