Bush Flip-Flops on Global Warming

Discussing all things political in NW Arkansas and beyond.
Post Reply
User avatar
Doug
Posts: 3388
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 10:05 pm
Designate the number of cents in half a dollar: 0
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Contact:

Bush Flip-Flops on Global Warming

Post by Doug »

Bush Disses Global Warming Report

WASHINGTON, June 4, 2002
(CBS) President Bush dismissed on Tuesday a report put out by his administration warning that human activities are behind climate change that is having significant effects on the environment.

The report released by the Environmental Protection Agency was a surprising endorsement of what many scientists and weather experts have long argued — that human activities such as oil refining, power plants and automobile emissions are important causes of global warming.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CBS/AP)
"(The report) undercuts everything the president has said about global warming since he took office."
Philip Clapp,
National Environmental Trust
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See here.
==================
The Bush administration has refused to allow climate experts to even participate in climate policy discussions, asserts Rosina Bierbaum, a former director of the White House science office. Rather than consult with its own scientific advisors when devising a strategy on climate change, the White House constructed a plan primarily from conversations with the National Economic Counsel.

"I wasn't asked anything," says Bierbaum, now dean of the University of Michigan's School of Natural Resources and Environment. "In fact, I was told to stop sending weekly science updates to the White House, as had been the tradition with the previous administration."
See here.
==================

And now:

QUESTION: I know you are not planning to see Al Gore's new movie, but do you agree with the premise that global warming is a real and significant threat to the planet --

BUSH: I think it's -- I have said consistently that global warming is a serious problem. There's a debate over where it's man-made or naturally caused. We ought to get beyond that debate and start implementing that -- the technologies necessary to -- to enable us to achieve a couple of big objectives: one, be good stewards of the environment; two, become less dependent on foreign sources of oil, for economic reasons and for national security reasons.

That's why we're pressing for clean coal technology. That's why the hydrogen initiative is -- is robust. In other words, we want our children being able to drive cars not fueled by gasoline but by hydrogen. That's why I've been a strong advocate of ethanol as an alternative source of -- of fuel to run our cars.

I strongly believe that we ought to be developing, you know, safe nuclear power. The truth of the matter is, if this country was -- it wants to get rid of its greenhouse gases, we got to have nuclear power industry be vibrant and viable.

And so I believe in -- and I've got a plan to be able to deal with greenhouse gases.

Here.

===========
DOUG
I put the bold face on the first quotation, and Bush's bull in red. Not all of it, though. Then it would be mostly red.
"We could have done something important Max. We could have fought child abuse or Republicans!" --Oona Hart (played by Victoria Foyt), in the 1995 movie "Last Summer in the Hamptons."
Barbara Fitzpatrick
Posts: 2232
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:55 am
Designate the number of cents in half a dollar: 0

Post by Barbara Fitzpatrick »

You definitely should have put "That's why we're pressing for clean coal technology. That's why the hydrogen initiative is - is robust" in red. Both "initiatives" are "unfunded mandates", as far as Bushco are concerned. Their ethanol initiative is just another excuse for ConAgra and ADM subsidies - it's corn-based, not biomass-based. His main plan to deal with greenhouse gases is to ignore their existance.
Barbara Fitzpatrick
Post Reply