Rudy defending "no attacks" under Bush

[Dardedar]

Gluiani has been going around making a fool of himself, saying there were no domestic terrorist under Bush, quote: "We had no domestic attacks under Bush. We’ve had one under Obama,....” (Dana Perino said this too). Of course the clarification is that he meant to say we weren't attacked since Sept. 11th on George Bush's watch. An obvious boo. No big deal.

However:

"When asked about the anthrax attacks, Giuliani claims that wasn't a terrorist attack because the FBI didn't ever figure out who did it, and it "was not done in the name of Islamic terrorism." Oy.

Media Matters has a list here.

This fellow has put together some charts laying it all out.

Terrorist Attacks and Presidents

"...a pair of graphs to illustrate incidents of terrorism during each of the last three presidents, including President Obama, as a means of locking down what happened and when."





All found at: Crooks and liars

[cantwait2012]

all ive read so far are repub. bashing I thought this was a freethinkers site.as for my own opinion Obama is just Bush's 3rd term we still have a fed. reserve and the patriot act is still in place and obama is still continuing to attack the constitution.

[Betsy]

okay. please explain with examples and sources how Obama is 'attacking the constitution.'